Whelan v. Rossiter
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHall, J.
This is an appeal upon the judgment-roll from a judgment in favor of plaintiff whereby he recovered two thousand dollars, deposit on a contract for sale of a piece of real estate. By the terms of the contract fifteen days were allowed to examine title, and if found defective, purchaser was to state his objections in writing, and seller was to have a reasonable time to perfect title. Abstract of title to be furnished by seller. The abstract was furnished by defendant, and in due time plaintiff in writing specified to defendant his objections to the title, and thereafter defendant announced to…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Fleming v. . BurnhamNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
- Jeffries v. JeffriesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
- Wetmore v. . BruceNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Turner v. McDonaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Los Angeles Terminal Land Co. v. MuirCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Wheeler v. SullivanSupreme Court of Florida · 1925
- Evans v. FaughtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Wheeler v. SullivanSupreme Court of Florida · 1925
- Hawes v. LuxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Tandy v. WaeschCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.