Legal Opinion

Tate v. Industrial Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 1964PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.

1. Support for finding of voluntary termination. If an employee absents himself from work, but does not intend to terminate the employment relationship, his failure to notify his employer of the reason and probable duration of his absence, might, under some circumstances, constitute misconduct connected with his employment so that if the employer discharges him therefor, the employee would be ineligible for unemployment compensation benefits accrued with respect to that employing unit. In order for such misconduct to exist, there must be an intentional and substantial disregard of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Milwaukee Transformer Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Dentici v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Ace Associates, Inc. v. NagyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Fitzgerald v. Globe-Union, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  2. VOCATION. TECH. &ADULT ED. DIST. 13 v. ILHR Dept.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Shuler v. Virginia Employment CommissionCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1989
  4. Vocational, Technical & Adult Education, District 13 v. Department of IndustryWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Fish v. White Equipment Sales & Service, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API