Frederick C. Ochsner and Edwin A. Miller v. Walter R. Millis
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WEINMAN, District Judge.
Frederick C. Ochsner and Edwin A. Miller are the junior parties in an interference proceeding now pending in the patent office; Walter R. Millis is the senior party. In that proceeding, where the ultimate question to be determined by the board of patent interferences is “priority of invention” [35 U.S.C.A. § 135 (a)], it is the contention of the junior parties that the senior party first learned of the specific subject matter of the interference from the junior parties and later encompassed the development in an application for patent although it was not specifically…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Cobbledick v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Swift & Co. Packers v. Compania Colombiana Del Caribe, S. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Westinghouse Electric Corporation v. City of Burlington, VermontCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1965
- Jack S. MacHin v. Eugene M. Zuckert, Secretary of the Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1963
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Heat & Control, Inc. v. Hester Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- Premium Service Corporation v. The Sperry & Hutchinson Company, George A. ScottCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Joe R. Brown v. Britt O. Braddick, Joe R. Brown v. Britt O. BraddickCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Atkin, Wright & Miles, CharteredUtah Supreme Court · 1984
- Twylah Sue Hooker v. Continental Life Insurance Company, a Texas CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.