Legal Opinion

Louis F. Dow Co. v. Bittner

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 7, 1932No. 29,060PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

Action for the purchase price of merchandise, resulting in a decision, a jury having been waived, for plaintiff. Defendants appeal from the judgment.

Defendants were copartners who, January 16, 1930, contracted with plaintiff for the purchase of 400 calendars, upon which, according to the contract, certain indicated advertising of defendants and their business was to be printed. After that printing was done, but before delivery of the calendars “f. o. b. cars, St. Paul,” as the contract required, defendants attempted to repudiate. Their one de fense now is that while they might be liable for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rail v. Little Falls Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
  2. Presley Fruit Co. v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  3. Sherman Nursery Co. v. AughenbaughSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
  4. Bundy v. MeyerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Adams v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1962
  2. E. Albrecht & Son, Inc. v. LandyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1939
  3. B. A. Griffin Co. v. Northwestern Fish & Seafood Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  4. Reese v. EvansSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  5. Rosen v. GarstonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API