Legal Opinion

Martel v. Lafayette Sugar Refining Co.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided February 26, 1923No. 25477PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSt. Paul, J.

This is a suit on a promissory note, and the defense is failure of consideration, and denial that plaintiff is a holder in due course.

I

Defendant purchased from the Martel Apparatus Company certain sugar filters for the price of $20,000, of which $5,000 was paid when the order was given, $5,000 was to be paid on delivery, and the bálance after 30 days’ satisfactory operation. The contract guaranteed that the filters would handle satisfactorily the juice of 1,000 tons of cane daily, and the vendor agreed to refund the amount paid if the filters should not accomplish the guaranty.

When the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State National Bank v. CasonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1887
  2. Sadler v. WhiteSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1859
  3. Pavey v. StaufferSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1893
  4. A. Marx & Sons v. N. Frey, Ltd.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1915
  5. Barelli v. SzymanskiSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1859

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Tyler v. Whitney-Central Trust & Savings BankSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1924
  2. Cotton v. John Deere Plow Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1944
  3. First State Bank & Trust Co. v. CrainSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1924
  4. Azar v. SlackNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Mitchell v. HolomonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1929

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API