Legal Opinion

Shotzman v. Ward

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 26, 1952No. 38,497PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Parker, J.:

The plaintiffs Mary Shotzman and Jean M. Shotzman, her son, brought this action on April 28, 1950, claiming they were entitled to repurchase 452 acres of land, formerly owned by the first named plaintiff and deeded by her to the defendant, N. J. Ward, under the terms of an option contract entered into between Mrs. Shotzman and Ward on the date of the execution and delivery of the conveying instrument. Plaintiffs also sought an accounting but that question is not now involved because, by agreement of the parties, the issue submitted and tried…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Rasing v. HealzerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1943
  2. Bradbury v. WiseSupreme Court of Kansas · 1949
  3. Gray v. Hercules Powder Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1946
  4. Hoffman v. HoffmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1943
  5. Brown v. PughSupreme Court of Kansas · 1949

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Loose v. BrubacherSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
  2. Estate of Osborn v. MullikenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1956
  3. In Re Estate of JohnsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1954
  4. McFadden v. McFaddenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1956
  5. Whipple v. FehsenfeldSupreme Court of Kansas · 1952

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API