Legal Opinion

Ideal Wrapping Mach. Co. v. George Close Co.

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided January 23, 1928No. 2154PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

LOWELL, District Judge.

This was a bill in equity for the infringement of letters patent No. 1,082,331 and No. 1,082,463, both issqed on December 23, 1913, to Archibald E. Hopkins and Olin S. Fellows, for a candy wrapping machine, and assigned to the complainant. The respondent does not contest their validity, nor does it deny that what it did would under ordinary circumstances have been an infringement. Its contention is that under the circumstances of the present ease its 'aetions were legal.

The letters patent sued on cover a machine for wrapping small cubes of candy, especially caramels.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Continental Paper Bag Co. v. Eastern Paper Bag Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Motion Picture Patents Co. v. Universal Film Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
  3. United Shoe MacHinery Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  4. Bloomer v. McQuewanSupreme Court of the United States · 1853
  5. United States v. United Shoe Machinery Co. of New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1917

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kuther v. LeuschnerDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API