Legal Opinion
Arthur Earl Marshall v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided January 22, 1970No. 26037_1PublishedCited by 95 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GOLDBERG, Circuit Judge:
Appellant Arthur Earl Marshall posits two fallibilities in his conviction for possession of an illegally made firearm. 1 First, he asserts error in the evidentiary use of the fruit of a search he deems illegal. Secondly, he claims that his conviction violated Fifth Amendment rights vouchsafed to him through Marchetti, 2 Grosso, 3 and Haynes. 4
The facts can be briefly summarized. On September 9, 1967, Roland A. Kinsey, Jr., a deputy sheriff in Harris County, Texas, was on his regular tour of duty as an accident investigator. At about 1:15 a. m. on that date he stopped…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Leary v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Marchetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Grosso v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by95 opinions
- United States v. Alfred Earl HarflingerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971
- United States v. James Lee WorthingtonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- United States v. Felder M. Davis and Houston Felder DavisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- State v. RoseWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- Vogel v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1980
90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.