Legal Opinion

Columbia Insurance Co. v. Artale

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided March 10, 1933PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The complainant insured the Artales against loss by fire to the extent of $11,000. Loss, under a standard mortgagee clause, was made payable to the Home Building and Loan Association, the holder of a $7,000 mortgage (see form in Selray Investment Co. v. Massimino, 110 N.J. Eq. 300). There was a fire and an explosion, and, believing them not accidental, the complainant refused to pay any loss to the Artales. Being bound by the standard mortgagee clause in the policy to make good the loss to the mortgagee, regardless of liability to the Artales, the complainant paid the building and loan…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Svea Assurance Co. v. PackhamCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1901
  2. Nagle v. ConardNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1924
  3. Andrews v. StelleSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1871
  4. Brunetti v. GrandiNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1918
  5. Selray Investment Co. v. MassiminoNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1932

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Flavell v. FlavellNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1937
  2. American Automobile Ins. Co. v. NiebuhrNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1938
  3. Driscoll v. Burlington-Bristol Bridge Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
  4. Hobson Construction Co., Inc. v. Max Drill, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
  5. Morrison v. MorrisonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1966

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API