Andrews v. Stelle
Supreme Court of New Jersey
The opinion of the Chancellor is reported in 4 C. N. Green 410.
1Opinion of the Court
Tlie opinion of tlie court was delivered by
Vast Syokel, J.
To tlie bill filed for the foreclosure of a mortgage given to the complainant, Andrews and wife, tlie mortgagors, set up in their answer two defences: First. That Stelle holds the mortgage in trust for the City Bank of Perth Amboy, an insolvent corporation, and that the receivers of the bank must bo parties. Second. Usury.
Before the bill was filed, Andrews’ equity of redemption in the whole of the mortgaged premises had been sold, and it is insisted that ho cannot, therefore, sot up the defence of usury in this case. Andrews, having no…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Vroom v. DitmasNew York Court of Chancery · 1834
- Gelston v. HoytNew York Court of Chancery · 1815
- Ehle v. BinghamNew York Supreme Court · 1849
- Kingsland v. SpaldingNew York Court of Chancery · 1848
3Cited by4 opinions
- Mann v. BugbeeNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1933
- Usbe Bldg. v. Ocean Pier RealtyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1933
- Columbia Insurance Co. v. ArtaleNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1933
- Fidelity Union Tr. v. Multiple RealtyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1942