Legal Opinion

Cardaro v. Aerojet General Corp.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided January 29, 2013No. MDL No. 875; Civil Action No. 11-66763Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

ROBERT F. KELLY, Senior District Judge.

Presently before this Court is Defendant, General Electric Company’s, Motion for Summary Judgment against Plaintiffs, Terry and Jo Ann Cardaro, along with Plaintiffs’ Response in Opposition and Defendant’s Reply. For the reasons set forth below, Defendant’s Motion is denied.

I. FACTS

In 1950 and 1958, Defendant, General Electric Company (“GE”), manufactured, shipped and supervised the erection of two land-based turbine generators at Louisiana Power & Light’s (“LP & L”) Nine Mile Point Steam Electric Station. (Doc. 54-3 ¶ 2-3.) Plaintiff Terry…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  4. Rando v. Anco Insulations Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2009
  5. Cole v. Celotex Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1992

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API