Legal Opinion
United States v. Darryl Wallace
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided August 14, 2006No. 05-3675PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOOD, Circuit Judge.
In this appeal, we again confront the question of the proper approach to appel late review of the reasonableness of a federal sentence. Appellant Darryl Wallace pleaded guilty to wire fraud, 18 U.S.C. § 1343. Despite the fact that the Sentencing Guidelines advise that a term between 24 and 30 months is appropriate for Wallace, the district court judge decided that the reasonable sentence for Wallace was a significantly more lenient one: three years’ probation plus a $2,000 fine. In addition, the court imposed several special conditions of probation, including an order that…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Koon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Woodford v. VisciottiSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- United States v. FernandezCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- United States v. Calvin Caver (05-3295) Tamir Abdullah (05-3297) Fred Cloud (05-3344)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. MirandaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
- United States v. Daryl L. Wilson, Stevie Thomas, Donnell L. Cohn, Sammy Armstead, and Tyree CollinsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
- United States v. Robert E. MaloneyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. WachowiakCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.