Hudson v. Helman
District Court, C.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
McDADE, District Judge.
On October 30, 1996, this Court ordered Respondent to respond to Petitioner Raymond Clay Hudson’s § 2241 Petition within 45 days. Presently before the Court is Hudson’s Motion to Amend Show Cause Order to Comply with Statute [Doc. # 6] in which he contends that 45 days is far too long a time for the response. Hudson relies on 28 U.S.C. § 2243 which provides in relevant part:
The writ, or order to show cause shall be directed to the person having custody of the person detained. It shall be returned within three days unless for good cause additional time, not…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Robert C. Bleitner v. George C. Welborn and Attorney General of the State of IllinoisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Kramer v. JenkinsDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1985
3Cited by36 opinions
- Erwin v. EloDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2001
- Ukawabutu v. MortonDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
- Akers v. HillDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2023
- Akers v. SimpkinsDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2023
- Akers v. SimpkinsDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2023
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.