Legal Opinion

Akers v. Simpkins

District Court, S.D. Illinois

Decided March 15, 2023No. 3:23-cv-00043Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS MONTGOMERY CARL AKERS, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) vs. ) Case No. 3:23-cv-43-DWD ) NATHAN SIMPKINS, ) ) Respondent. ) MEMORANDUM & ORDER DUGAN, District Judge: Petitioner, an inmate at USP Marion, filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. It is now before the Court for a preliminary review under Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts, which states: “If it plainly appears from the petition and any attached exhibits that the petitioner is not entitled to…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Mayle v. FelixSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  3. Jimmy Walker v. J.T. O'brien, and Joseph W. Finfrock v. Craig A. HanksCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
  4. Todd R. Chazen v. Matthew MarskeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
  5. United States v. Quadale ColemanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API