Husvar v. Engineered Products, Inc.
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the CourtRudman, J.
[¶ 1] Engineered Products, Inc. appeals from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board granting Joseph Husvar’s petition for award. The Board concluded that because Husvar suffered memory loss as a result of his injury and because he could not recall the circumstances of his injury, he is entitled to the benefit of a statutory presumption that his injury is work-related. See 39-A M.R.S.A. § 327 (Supp.1999). The Board also rejected Engineered’s reliance on the intoxication defense, 39-A M.R.S.A. § 202 (Supp.1999), concluding that while Husvar may have been intoxicated, he was not on duty…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Comeau v. Maine Coastal ServicesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
- Morse v. Laverdiere's Super Drug StoreSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
- Dufour v. Internal Medicine AssociatesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998
3Cited by2 opinions
- Standring v. Town of SkowheganSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2005
- Standring v. Town of SkowheganSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2005