Legal Opinion

Morse v. Laverdiere's Super Drug Store

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided August 1, 1994PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLIFFORD, Justice.

Both cases in this consolidated appeal involve the determination of whether the employees sustained them burden of proving that their unexplained injuries “arose out of’ employment as required by the Workers’ Compensation Act. See 39 M.R.S.A. § 51(1) (1989), repealed and replaced by P.L.1991, ch. 885, § A-7 (effective January 1, 1993), codified as 39-A M.R.S.A. § 201 (Supp. 1993). 1 In the first consolidated case, the employee, Marguerite Morse, appeals from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board denying her petition for award. In the second ease, the employer, Saco &…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Riley v. Bath Iron Works Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
  2. Labbe v. Nissen Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
  3. Comeau v. Maine Coastal ServicesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
  4. Bryant v. Masters MacHine Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
  5. Barrett v. Herbert Engineering, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1977

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Standring v. Town of SkowheganSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2005
  2. Moore v. Pratt & Whitney AircraftSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995
  3. Fournier v. Aetna, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2006
  4. Husvar v. Engineered Products, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
  5. Easler v. DodgeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API