Legal Opinion

Klick v. Snavely

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 28, 1928No. 21348PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court.

On September 15, 1928, the relator filed in this court an original action in quo war ranto asking for a judgment of ouster against the respondent, and an induction of the relator into office. The petition in quo warranto alleged that the respondent was “wrongfully holding said office and exercising the powers, functions and prerogatives thereof.”

Section 12303, General Code, authorizes an action in quo warranto against a person “who usurps, intrudes into, or unlawfully holds or exercises, a public office.”

This action is brought by the relator in his private relation. Such being…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Neguse v. McIntosh (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  2. Marsh v. Goldthorpe, MayorOhio Supreme Court · 1930
  3. National Distillers & Chemical Corp. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  4. City of Parma v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  5. State Ex Rel. Bolsinger v. OridgeOhio Supreme Court · 1938

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API