Legal Opinion · Dissent

Renner v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided December 21, 1988No. 13-87-357-CRPublished

1DissentNye, Chief Justice

I respectfully dissent because I do not find that the parole instruction 'made any contribution to the punishment assessed by the jury. Tex.R.App.P. 81(b)(2) provides that if the record in a criminal case reveals error, we shall reverse the judgment, unless we determine beyond a reasonable doubt that the error made no contribution to the conviction or to the punishment.

In the instant case, the jury found appellant guilty of aggravated sexual assault of a child and assessed the maximum sentence provided for this crime by our legislature, life imprisonment. In applying the harmless error test…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rose v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  2. Gamez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
  3. Barry v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API