Hennessey v. Pennsylvania Board of Pardons
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1DissentFriedman, Judge
I respectfully dissent. Because I believe that Article IV, Section 9 of the Pennsylvania Constitution requires a public hearing on all applications for clemency, I would grant the motion for summary relief filed by Petitioner Joseph Hennessey and compel the Pennsylvania Board of Pardons (Pardons Board) to hold a public hearing1 on his application for commutation to life on parole.2
In reaching a contrary result, the Majority asserts that Article IV, Section 9 creates rights only in members of the public, not in prisoners (Majority Op. at 220), and that Hennessey has no other federal or state…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional ComplexSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Commonwealth v. EdmundsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Connecticut Board of Pardons v. DumschatSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- John H. Block v. Edwin PotterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.