Legal Opinion

Cullens v. Pierce

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 10, 1958No. 20171PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

' Candler, Justice.

Grady Cullens brought mandamus against the governing officials of the City of Dublin to compel them to issue him a permit for the erection of a filling station. The writ was granted by the trial judge, and the defendants excepted. On review, this court reversed the judgment and in doing so held that the evidence demanded a finding that the applicant had not executed an application for the permit, which an ordinance of the city required as a prerequisite to its issuance. See Pierce v. Cullens, 213 Ga. 649 (100 S. E. 2d 732). Before the remittitur from this court was made the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jenkins v. LaneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
  2. Harrell v. ParkerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  3. Cooper v. Oglethorpe Savings & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1918
  4. Baker v. Decatur Lumber & Supply Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1955
  5. Pierce v. CullensSupreme Court of Georgia · 1957

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Russell v. RussellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API