Legal Opinion

Davis Brothers Realty Corp. v. Harte

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 4, 1921PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal by the plaintiff, Davis Brothers Realty Corporation, Inc., in each of the above-entitled actions, from an order and determination of the Appellate Term, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 24th day of June, 1920, reversing final orders of the Municipal Court of the City of New York, Borough of Manhattan, First District, dispossessing respondents from 47 Warren street, borough of Manhattan.

1Opinion of the Court

Page, J.:

The building No. 47 Warren street consists of a cellar and five stories. The top three stories are occupied by the tenants Baylis and Frost and the second story by the tenant Harte, where they carry on business. Baylis and Frost manufacture chemicals and perfumery sachets, employing about ten people at labor. Harte and his subtenant are engaged in the towel supply and printing business and employ about five people at labor. The building was, therefore, a “factory” within the definition of the Labor Law (§ 2, as amd. by Laws of 1917, chap. 694), and the provisions of that statute are…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kleinstein v. GonskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
  2. Davis Bros. Realty Corp. v. HarteAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1920

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Norman S. Riesenfeld, Inc. v. R-W Realty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928
  2. Brause v. 2968 Third Avenue Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1963
  3. Hayman v. Butler Bros.Syracuse City Court · 1949
  4. 10 Suf Realty, Inc. v. Irving FinsCity of New York Municipal Court · 1951
  5. Estate of Cohen v. Trestina Dress Manufacturing Co.City of New York Municipal Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API