Legal Opinion

Fischer v. Division West Chinchilla Ranch

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided March 10, 1970No. 5-69-Civ. 44PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER FOR JUDGMENT

NEVILLE, District Judge.

At various dates in late 1966 and early 1967 the seven co-plaintiffs in this action, after listening to and being motivated by defendant’s television advertisements, each paid or obligated themselves to pay $2,150 or more for one male and six female chinchillas together with an additional sum for cages, pumice (for baths), feed and supplies. 1 Each contemplated becoming a chinchilla rancher on the representations that “Chinchilla ranching can be done in basements, spare rooms, closed in porches and out…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Leif M. Hanson v. Ford Motor Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1960
  3. Robert E. Hedberg v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965
  4. Vulcan Metals Co. v. Simmons Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1918
  5. Spiess v. BrandtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Harry Bechtel and Cathleen Bechtel, Husband and Wife v. Liberty National Bank, a National Banking AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
  2. Yost v. MillhouseCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  3. In re Gen. Motors LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
  4. Northern States Power Co. v. International Telephone & Telegraph Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1982
  5. Spitzmueller v. Burlington Northern RailroadDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API