Legal Opinion

Litak v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 20, 1993No. 995 C.D. 1992PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PALLADINO, Judge.

Richard E. Litak (Claimant) appeals from part of an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) which affirmed a referee’s suspension of benefits for Claimant’s failure to undergo reasonable and necessary treatment. 1 We affirm.

Claimant sustained a back injury while performing his duties as a line technician for Comcast Cablevision (Employer). 2 Following the injury, Claimant was examined by several orthopedic surgeons, including Robert M. Yanchus, M.D. and Michael P. Casey, M.D. Both doctors diagnosed Claimant as suffering from spondylolisthesis and agreed that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kachinski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Bethenergy Mines, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  3. Joyce Western Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Kovalchick Salvage Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. Republic Steel Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Land O'Lakes, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  2. Commonwealth, Department of Labor & Industry v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. Bereznicki v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  4. Genuardi Supermarkets v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  5. Com. v. WCAB (Exel Logistics)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API