Legal Opinion

Cannon v. Urlacher

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 15, 1989PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— Judgment unanimously reversed on the law without costs, determination confirmed, and petition dismissed. Memorandum: It was error for the court to remit this matter for a new administrative hearing at which respondent’s licensing records must be considered. The Hearing Officer properly refused to enforce the subpoena duces tecum demanding the production of respondent’s licensing records because those records were not relevant to the issues to be determined at the hearing. Petitioner sought to introduce those records to support his claim of discriminatory enforcement. A claim of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Di Maggio v. BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 1967
  2. Bell v. New York State Liquor AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
  3. Feigman v. KlepakAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. FerroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  2. Miramax Films Corp. v. Motion Picture Ass'n of America, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Aria Contracting Corp. v. McGowanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  4. Glatt v. Town of WilliamstownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  5. Mimassi v. Town of Whitestown Zoning Board of AppealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API