Legal Opinion

Saxton v. Plum Orchards, Inc.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided April 25, 1949No. 38998PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAMITER, Justice.

Invoking the attractive nuisance doctrine, plaintiffs sued to recover damages for the loss of their four year old daughter whose lifeless body was found in a deep pool of water on defendant’s property, they alleging that the child’s drowning was due entirely to the negligence of defendant in creating and maintaining the pool which was alluring and attractive to children.

Answering, defendant generally denied plaintiffs’ allegations, and it affirmatively showed as follows:

“And now for further answer to the plaintiffs petition defendant avers that it is the owner of the house in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Tomlinson v. VicksburgSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1918
  2. McKenna v. City of ShreveportLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1931
  3. Peters v. PearceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1920
  4. Peters v. Town of RustonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1936
  5. Fincher v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1918

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Walker v. Union Oil Mill, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1979
  2. Murcelo v. H. I. Hettinger & Co.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1965
  3. Allien v. Louisiana Power & Light CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1967
  4. Smith v. Preferred Risk Mutual Insurance CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1966
  5. McGill v. City of LaurelMississippi Supreme Court · 1965

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API