Legal Opinion

Szefczek v. Hillsborough Beacon

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided January 23, 1995PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

286 N.J. Super. 247 (1995)

668 A.2d 1099

CONSTANCE SZEFCZEK, PRO SE, PLAINTIFF,

v.

HILLSBOROUGH BEACON, DEFENDANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division Special Civil Part Small Claims Division Somerset County.

Decided January 23, 1995.

Constance Szefczek, plaintiff pro se.

Alexander F. McGimpsey, Jr. for defendant (McGimpsey & Cafferty, attorneys).

John L. Jacobus, Assistant United States Attorney for the Federal Communications Commission, Intervenor.

DUPUIS, J.S.C.

This case came before the court for trial on January 23, 1995.

The court finds the following facts:

After receiving several live…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. R. A. v. v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1992

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Edwards v. Emperor's Garden RestaurantNevada Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Charvat v. GVN Michigan, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
  3. Hooters of Augusta, Inc. v. NicholsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  4. Worsham v. Nationwide InsuranceCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  5. Zelma v. MARKET USANew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2001

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API