Legal Opinion
Worsham v. Nationwide Insurance
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
Decided May 3, 2001No. 0454, Sept. Term, 2000PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ADKINS, Judge.
This is a tale of two telephone calls. Michael C. Worsham, appellant, asks us to reverse the trial court’s grant of summary judgment on his claims that Nationwide Insurance Company, appellee, violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991 (“TCPA”), 47 U.S.C. § 227. We conclude that summary judgment was warranted on the counts relating to the first call, but was prematurely granted on the counts relating to the second call.
FACTS AND LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
Because we must view the evidence, and the inferences from it, in the light most favorable to the party opposing summary…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Heat & Power Corp. v. Air Products & Chemicals, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
- International Science & Technology Institute, Incorporated v. Inacom Communications, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
- John J. Murphey, an Individual v. Warren Lanier, an Individual Rjd Enterprises, a Partnership Opinion Does, 1-5Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Hooters of Augusta, Inc. v. NicholsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
- Kaplan v. Democrat & ChronicleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Charvat v. EchoStar Satellite, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
- Charvat v. GVN Michigan, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- Reynolds v. Diamond Foods & Poultry, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2002
- R.A. Ponte Architects, Ltd. v. Investors' Alert, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
- Chair King, Inc. v. GTE Mobilnet of Houston, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2004
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.