Legal Opinion

Bowers v. Alexandria Bank

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 19, 1921No. 10,745PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBatman, J.

Appellant filed a claim against the estate of appellee’s decedent, based on a promissory note. The claim was not allowed, and, pursuant to the provisions of the statute, it was transferred to the issue docket. In due course it was submitted to the court for trial, without an answer having been filed. On request the court made a special finding of facts and stated its conclusions of law thereon. The substance of so much of said special finding of facts, as is necessary to an understanding of the question submitted for our determination, is as follows: Appellant and said decedent were married…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. West v. CavinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Adams v. . AdamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  3. Ritenour v. MathewsIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Abelman v. HaehnelIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
  5. Moayon v. MoayonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1903

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Brown, Administrator v. AddingtonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1944
  2. Campbell v. PraterWyoming Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Mays v. WadelIndiana Court of Appeals · 1968
  4. Galbraith v. GalbraithIndiana Court of Appeals · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API