Legal Opinion

In re M.L.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 22, 2000PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CASTILLE, Justice.

Allowance of appeal was granted in this matter limited to the issue of whether a court may properly adjudge a child to be dependent where the non-custodial parent is ready, willing and able to provide the child with proper parental care and control. The Superior Court affirmed the trial court’s finding of dependency in the instant case even though the child’s father was available and willing to provide adequate care for the child. We hold that a child, whose non-custodial parent is ready, willing and able to provide adequate care to the child, cannot be found dependent and,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Charles v. StehlikSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  2. In Re BarclaySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. In re D.A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Patterson v. Armstrong County Children and Youth ServicesDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2001
  3. In the Interest of R.P.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  4. In the Interest of S.B.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  5. Masser v. MillerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API