Division of Labor Law Enforcement v. Stanley Restaurants, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
STEPHENS, Circuit Judge.
This appeal has been here before, and it may be seen in our opinion in United States v. Division of Labor Law Enforcement, 9 Cir., 1953, 201 F.2d 857, 36 A.L.R.2d 1197, that we held an assignment to a private assignee for benefit of creditors under Section 1204 of the California Code of Civil Procedure1 does not prevail *422in favor of labor claims over claims of the United States by Rev.Stat. 3466.2 We reversed the district court and remanded the case, to hold accordingly.
The mandate of this court was filed and spread upon the records of the district court which then held…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Illinois Ex Rel. Gordon v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Virginia Land Co. v. Miami Shipbuilding Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1953
- Mercado v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1950
- In Re the General Assignment for the Benefit of Creditors of Pavone Textile Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1951
- Kennebec Box Co. v. OS Richards CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. American Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers, Application of Shenandoah Valley Broadcasting, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
- People v. WarfelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Division Of Labor Law Enforcement v. Stanley Restaurants, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955