Legal Opinion

Geico General Insurance Co. v. Paton

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 8, 2014No. 4D13-2166PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Geico General Insurance Company petitions for a writ of certiorari from two trial court orders that permit discovery of its attorney’s billing records. The records were sought by the respondent in support of her claim for attorney’s fees in the litigation below. We grant the petition because the respondent failed to make the showing required to obtain her opponent’s attorney’s fee records.

This case is controlled by Estilien v. Dyda, 93 So.3d 1186 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012). That case took the view that “the records of one’s opponent are, at best, only marginally relevant to the general issue of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. HCA HEALTH SERVICES OF FLORIDA, INC. v. HillmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
  2. Estilien v. DydaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kelly Paton v. Geico General Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 2016
  2. Kelly Paton v. Geico General Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API