Legal Opinion

Estilien v. Dyda

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 8, 2012No. 4D12-1473PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Balande Estilien petitions for a writ of certiorari from a circuit court order permitting discovery of his attorney’s billing records. We grant the petition because the trial court departed from the essential requirements of law in allowing the discovery of these records without a sufficient showing of relevancy and need.

Respondent Steven Dyda sued Estilien for injuries suffered in an auto accident and obtained a verdict in his favor. Dyda then filed a motion to tax costs and attorney’s fees because Estilien had rejected an offer of settlement under section 768.79(6)(b), Fla. Stat. (2012).…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Allstate Ins. Co. v. LangstonSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
  2. Friedman v. Heart Inst. of Port St. Lucie, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 2003
  3. Finol v. FinolDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
  4. Mangel v. Bob Dance Dodge, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  5. Anderson Columbia v. BrownDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kelly Paton v. Geico General Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 2016
  2. Geico General Insurance Co. v. PatonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
  3. Kelly Paton v. Geico General Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API