Legal Opinion
Jones v. Invasix Inc.
District Court, M.D. Tennessee
Decided February 1, 2021No. 3:19-cv-00860Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION MIA JONES, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. 3:19-cv-0860 ) Judge Aleta A. Trauger INVASIX INC. and INMODE LTD., ) ) Defendants. ) ) MEMORANDUM Defendants Invasix Inc. (“Invasix”) and InMode Ltd. (“InMode”) have filed a Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 90), to which Mia Jones has filed a Response (Doc. No. 104), the defendants have filed a Reply (Doc. No. 111), Jones has filed a Sur-Reply (Doc. No. 115), and the defendants have filed a Sur-Sur-Reply (Doc. No. 118.) Jones has filed a Motion to Strike Summary…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.