State v. Cortez
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the CourtKeller, P.J.
Meyers, Keasler, Hervey, Alcala , Richardson, Yeary and Newell, JJ, joined.
Holding that a traffic stop was illegal, the trial court granted a motion to suppress. One of the State’s arguments on appeal was that, if the police officer was mistaken about whether appellee had committed a traffic offense, the traffic stop was nevertheless legal as a reasonable mistake of law under Heien v. North Carolina.1 Citing cases from our Court that predate Heien, the court .of appeals concluded that even a reasonable mistake about the law would not justify a stop. However, the court of appeals did not…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Heien v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Powell v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1999
- Abney, Rickey DewayneCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2013
- Robinson, Timothy LeeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2012
- Carsner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. CortezCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2018
- State v. ArizmendiCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2017
- State v. CortezCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
- Joseph B. Wiggins v. Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor VehiclesSupreme Court of Florida · 2017
- Joseph B. Wiggins v. Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor VehiclesSupreme Court of Florida · 2017
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.