Legal Opinion

State v. Cortez

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 3, 2017No. 07-15-00196-CRPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION1

Brian Quinn, Chief Justice

At the suppression hearing, the trooper was asked: “So you’re telling the Court that because you see a van, it’s clean and it’s got two people in it, that [sic] was *918indicators of potential criminal activity for you?” The trooper answered: “Yes, sir, they are. They — in and of themselves are nothing, but in the total — when you start adding them all together, they can be.” When two people in a clean car indicate criminal activity, then the words of John Lennon have come to fruition: “Strange days indeed — most peculiar, mama.”3

Nonetheless, the foregoing…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Heien v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  2. Wilson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2010
  3. Hull v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
  4. State v. IduarteCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2008
  5. Abney, Rickey DewayneCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2013

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. CortezCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2018
  2. State v. WareOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
  3. Sammy Banegas v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API