Legal Opinion
State v. Poganski
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided September 2, 1977No. 46697PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PETERSON, Justice.
Defendant, Charles C. Poganski, a chiropractor, was convicted of theft by swindle and of conspiracy to commit theft. The basis for the convictions was his submission of bills to the MFA Insurance Companies (MFA) for the treatment of two patients who had falsely reported to MFA that they had been involved in an automobile accident. Defendant claimed that he had actually treated the two patients and did not know that the accident and claimed injuries were fictional.
The issue on appeal is whether defendant was denied a fair trial, under the rule of Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Napue v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- United States v. James Vincent KeoghCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- State v. PieschkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- State v. LarsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- State v. HuntSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- City of Minnetonka v. CarlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.