Legal Opinion

Balash v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 26, 1986No. A14-85-754-CRPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MURPHY, Justice.

Appellant was convicted by the court of the offense of public lewdness and punishment was assessed at a fine of five-hundred dollars. Appellant raises two points of error on appeal. In point of error number one she claims that the trial court erred in failing to grant her motion to set aside the information because the public lewdness statute is unconstitutionally vague as it is applied to this case and in point of error number two she claims the evidence is insufficient. We affirm.

Appellant, while dancing with a male partner at a local nightclub, was observed by…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. United States v. MazurieSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Houston v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
  4. McKenzie v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  5. Resnick v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Sullivan v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1999
  2. Byrum v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1988
  3. Wishnow v. Texas Alcoholic Beverage CommissionCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1988
  4. Balash v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1986
  5. Byrum v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API