Legal Opinion

Shea v. Danna

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 17, 1946Published

1Per curiam

An examination of the record indicates that sufficient facts were proven by plaintiff to establish at least prima facie a cause of action; However, it appears that during the course of the summation by plaintiff’s attorney reference was made to the fact that defendant’s counsel had failed to call as a witness a woman who was driving a car on the street where the accident occurred.

After the main charge was concluded the attorney representing the defendant made the following request among others: “ May I ask the Court then to charge the jury that in the matter of contributory negligence that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sackheim v. . PigueronNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
  2. Porter v. New York City Interborough Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
  3. Sarfaty v. New York City Interborough Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API