Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. LaFleur

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided July 14, 2003No. 02-P-1032PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKafker, J.

The defendant sought to suppress statements he made to a police officer while he was strapped to a stretcher and receiving medical assistance. The District Court judge allowed the motion to suppress concluding that the defendant, who had *547not been given Miranda warnings, was in custody when he made the statements. We reverse.

The judge found the following facts, none of which is alleged to be clearly erroneous: Police Officer Stephen Joy was dispatched to the scene of a two-car accident where he observed the defendant seated in the driver’s seat of one of the cars. The officer noted that the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. United States v. Brignoni-PonceSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. United States v. Juan Manuel Bautista, United States of America v. Javier Cabrera-MartinezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. DePeizaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2007
  2. Commonwealth v. SilvaMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2004
  3. Commonwealth v. McGrailMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2011
  4. Commonwealth v. BingMassachusetts Superior Court · 2008
  5. Commonwealth v. RichardsMassachusetts Superior Court · 2007

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API