Legal Opinion

Anderson-Thompson, Inc. v. Calley

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided January 25, 1956No. 6024PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COMPTON, Chief Justice.

Appellant, plaintiff below, rests its case on appeal on an alleged warranty arising out of a contract for the sale of certain sudan seed. The agreement between the parties consists of a memorandum designated “purchasing agreement” and is as follows:

“Purchasing Agreement

11-12-54

“Whereby Anderson-Thompson, Inc. of Lamar, Colo, is • buying crop of cert, sweet sudan subject to final certification at for the thresher run seed at thresher. Buyer to stand expense of hauling, cleanout, cleaning & bagging & cost of certified tag & seals and pay for storage for the month of Dec.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. GarciaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1914
  2. State v. GarciaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1942
  3. State v. HeislerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1954
  4. The Belt Seed Co. v. Mitchelhill Seed Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1941
  5. Yandell v. Anderson & SpilmanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Anderson v. ThomasSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959
  2. Anderson v. ThomasSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API