Marigold Coal, Incorporated v. Thames
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Per curiam
Plaintiff’s complaint, containing five amended counts, two based on wanton conduct and three on negligence of the defendant (appellant here), claims of the defendant $5,000.00 in damages alleged to have been the proximate result of concussions from the use of explosives by defendant in blasting operations preparatory to strip mining of coal.
The complaint avers structural damages to plaintiff’s dwelling house and garage; also marked decrease of water supply in her well to the point of inadequacy; and by amendment to the original counts it alleges that “plaintiff was frightened, caused to…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
- Carter v. ChambersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1885
- Clinton Mining Co. v. BradfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
- Alabama Great Southern Railroad Co. v. BishopSupreme Court of Alabama · 1956
- Burnwell Coal Co. v. SetzerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Trahan v. CookSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
- Feazell v. CampbellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
- Stephens v. Central of Georgia R. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1978
- Gilmer v. SalterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970
- T. R. Miller Mill Co. v. RallsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1966
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.