Legal Opinion

State v. Wynn

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided May 10, 1965No. 50917PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALTER H. BOHLING, Special Commissioner.

Virgil Major Wynn was found guilty of stealing property of a value of more than $50; to-wit: a television set of the value of $150. §§ 560.156 and 560.161; Laws 1955, p. 507; Laws 1957, p. 376. Statutory references are to RSMo 1959 and V.A.M.S. unless otherwise indicated. The charge was under the Habitual Criminal Act and, upon the jury’s verdict of guilty, the trial judge sentenced defendant to ten years’ imprisonment. Judgment accordingly.

A preponderance of the evidence established defendant’s guilt. There is no contention the State failed to make a…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Kickham v. CarterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
  2. State v. VelantiSupreme Court of Missouri · 1960
  3. State v. TompkinsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1955
  4. Arata v. Monsanto Chemical CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1961
  5. State ex rel. St. Louis Public Service Co. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. GilmoreSupreme Court of Missouri · 1984
  2. State v. HoltSupreme Court of Missouri · 1980
  3. State v. BerryMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. State v. MoonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. State v. TurnboughMissouri Court of Appeals · 1973

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API