Legal Opinion

Peters v. City of Tampa

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided July 3, 1934PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

An amended declaration alleged that the defendant City of Tampa, by an artificial construction of its own, confined a natural stream of water in a concrete sewer and thereby so augmented the natural force and violence of the water flowing therein against the sandy banks of the stream on the portions thereof which were not so confined, as to undermine said banks of said stream; that adjacent to the banks of the stream was a large open space of ground used as' a playground for children; that to such natural playground, children had for a long time been accustomed to resort to play; that by…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Stark v. HoltzclawSupreme Court of Florida · 1925
  2. Hawley v. City of AtlanticSupreme Court of Iowa · 1894

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Atlantic Peninsular Holding Co. v. OenbrinkSupreme Court of Florida · 1938
  2. Concrete Const., Inc., of Lake Worth v. PettersonSupreme Court of Florida · 1968
  3. Crutchfield v. AdamsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963
  4. Banks v. MasonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961
  5. Larnel Builders v. MartinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API