Legal Opinion
Lind v. Astrue
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided January 10, 2008No. 6:05-cr-06162PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
DAVID G. LARIMER, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
This is an action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) to review the final determination of the Commissioner of Social Security (“the Commissioner”) that plaintiff Charlotte Lind is not disabled under the Social Security Act, and therefore, is not entitled to disability insurance benefits (“DIB”).
Both plaintiff and the Commissioner has moved for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(c). For the reasons discussed below, the Commissioner’s motion is granted, plaintiffs motion is denied, and the complaint is…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Bowen v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Rita Schaal v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social Security, 1 Dockets 96-6212, 96-6316Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Ronald E. Veino, Sr. v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Munson v. SaulDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2021