State v. Hermes
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gray
The State of Montana (State) appeals from the order of the Nineteenth Judicial District Court, Lincoln Comity, suppressing a statement of Benedict Hermes (Hermes). We affirm.
We address the following issues on appeal:
1. Did the District Court err in suppressing Hermes’ statement after finding that the statement was involuntary?
2. Did the District Court err in determining that the State could not use Hermes’ statement for impeachment purposes?
In September of 1993, Detective Craig Martin (Martin) of the Lincoln County Sheriff’s Office received information from Jeff Wedel (Wedel), a social worker…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Mincey v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- State v. BowerMontana Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. RushtonMontana Supreme Court · 1994
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- State v. LohMontana Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. ScarboroughMontana Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. HayworthMontana Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. MunsonMontana Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. HillMontana Supreme Court · 2000
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.