Legal Opinion
Arnold v. Target Corporation
District Court, D. Nevada
Decided September 29, 2020No. 2:19-cv-01090Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 * * * 7 MARIE ARNOLD, Case No. 2:19-cv-1090-KJD-VCF 8 Plaintiff, ORDER 9 v. 10 TARGET CORPORATON, Defendant. 11 Presently before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (#34). Defendant 12 filed a response in opposition (#36) to which Plaintiff replied (#38). Also, before the Court is 13 Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (#39). Though the time for doing so has passed, 14 Plaintiff failed to file a response in opposition to Defendant’s motion.1 15 I. Facts 16 On March 19, 2019, Plaintiff was shopping at Target…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Robin Orr v. Bank of America, Nt & SaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.