Legal Opinion
In Re John G. Gasteiger & Co.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided April 9, 1928No. 760PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtL. Hand, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above). When the amendment of 1,926 was passed the time had long expired within which claims could be filed in this estate. The divisor for dividends had been therefore finally fixed, except in so far as any claims wore in process of liquidation, of which, so far as appears, there were none. True, the assets may not have been fully collected, but that was irrelevant; the creditor’s rights had been settled in accordance with the law as it then stood, and the appellant enjoyed no priority. We are to decide whether the change in section 64 (b) (7) is “practicable and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Shwab v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Chew Heong v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Fullerton-Krueger Lumber Co. v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Morton v. SniderCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
- Dreyfuss Dry Goods Co. v. MorganCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1927
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- In Re Mid America Co.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 1939
- In Re Old Algiers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1938
- In Re Inland Dredging CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
- Matter of FlaminiUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 1982
- Coin MacHine Acceptance Corp. v. O'DOnnellCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1951
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.