Legal Opinion
Ex Parte Perkov
District Court, S.D. California
Decided June 8, 1942No. 2232-RJPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JENNEY, District Judge.
The petition of Ante Perkov for a writ of habeas corpus was filed May 7, 1942. Instead of granting the writ, it was ordered that William A. Carmichael, District Director of the Immigration and Naturalization Service, appear and show cause why the writ should not issue. Pie made his return on May 16, 1942, stating, in part, that the petitioner is an alien, a subject of Yugoslavia. Under authority of the Attorney General of the United States, a warrant of arrest for an alien was issued. It directed that petitioner be taken into custody and granted a hearing to enable him…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Fong Yue Ting v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Ex Parte Bollman and SwartwoutSupreme Court of the United States · 1807
- Wright v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Bugajewitz v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Zakonaite v. WolfSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Mapp v. RenoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Mapp v. RenoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Carlson v. Landon. Stevenson v. Landon. Hyun v. Landon. Carlisle v. LandonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
- Principe v. AultDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1945
- Moraitis v. DelanyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1942
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.