Legal Opinion

Carlson v. Landon. Stevenson v. Landon. Hyun v. Landon. Carlisle v. Landon

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 13, 1951No. 12742-12745PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEPHENS, Circuit Judge.

The above entitled proceedings in habeas corpus are here upon a second appeal after remand with instructions. The appellant-petitioners, all aliens, are being held by the local Director of Immigration (Landon) upon instructions from the Attorney General 1 of the United States, pending hearing upon warrants of arrest and for deportation under the Act of October 16, 1918, as amended by the Internal Security Act of 1950, ch. 1024, Pub.Law 831, 8 U.S.C.A. § 137 et seq. Petitioners separately demanded their release through petitions for the issuance of the writ of habeas…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. American Communications Assn. v. DoudsSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Schneiderman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Wong Yang Sung v. McGrathSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  4. United States Ex Rel. Knauff v. ShaughnessySupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  5. Williamson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Carlson v. LandonSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. United States v. SchneidermanDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1952
  3. United States v. SchneidermanDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1951
  4. United States Ex Rel. Heikkinen v. GordonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1951
  5. Parker v. LesterDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1953

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API