Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Johnson

District Court, D. Nevada

Decided January 18, 1915No. A-17PublishedCited by 2 opinions

In Equity. Action by Roxa S. Johnson against William S. Johnson, with motions by Tonopah Banking Corporation and J. T. Garner, administrator with the will annexed of the estate of William S. Johnson, deceased, for orders permitting them to file complaints in intervention and a motion'by the administrator for an order making all creditors of the decedent parties defendant.

1Opinion of the Court

FARRINGTON, District Judge.

It was decided April 6, 1914, that the community property acquired during the marriage of Roxa S. Johnson and William S. Johnson must be divided between them. A master was appointed, who thereafter reported the character and value of tlie property. When this report came in, Mrs. Johnson was awarded an accounting, and the matter was again referred to the master, who filed a second report, in which he found that Mrs. Johnson is entitled to a judgment for §20,173.72, in addition to the share of the community property mentioned in the decree.

On the 16th day of November,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Waterman v. Canal-Louisiana Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
  2. Payne v. HookSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  3. Riggs v. Johnson CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1868
  4. State of Penn. v. THE WHEELING &C. BRIDGE CO.Supreme Court of the United States · 1852
  5. Hess v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1885

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Johnson v. GarnerDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1916
  2. Stewart v. WallCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API